Italianate Design in Brooklyn

Read Part 1 of this story.

A mid 19th century magazine, extolling the virtues of the Italianate brownstone, declared that, the doorway is the most indispensable feature of the structure, and therefore calls loudly for adornment, and should generally be distinguished by more impressive decoration than any other feature.

Architects of the time must have been listening, and many went overboard, piling layers of ornament on the doorways of our buildings. Perhaps even more than the other decorative elements, the doorways of the Italianate brownstone define the style.

In the most expensive homes, the doorway is a porch at the top of the stairs, formed by large columns with ornate capitals, holding heavy door hoods that are either rounded, or classic triangular pediments, with heavy carved keystones above the doors.

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

These are flanked by enormous acanthus leaf brackets which face the street. Smaller acanthus brackets can often be found facing each other in the doorway, and for good measure, more acanthus brackets often frame the windows, and/or support the large window box shelves below the parlor floor windows. There are fine examples in Brooklyn Heights, as well as on Washington Park, in Fort Greene.

Most of the Italianates in Brooklyn do not have the columns, a feature for only the most expensive homes, but all have the acanthus brackets. Some of these brackets are beautiful in their expression of plant forms, and are in amazing condition.

Some architects must have wanted to show off something different, and we can find fantastical combinations of leaves, flowers and decorative shapes. Some of these can be a bit disturbing at first glance, and to the modern eye, look like mutant plants run wild, or extruded foam, especially when the lines have been blurred by water damage, and badly painted over or repaired.

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

The more creepily vegetal remind us that tastes certainly change over time, and that the desire to please a demanding public can often result in the overdone.

Like any architectural style, over the course of its popularity, the Italianate brownstone can be found in its pure form, as a gracious upper class dwelling, and its knock-offs, as details are simplified for more middle class houses, and again, simplified even more for smaller working class homes, and the acanthus bracket becomes a plain curved shape.

As the years go by, similar styles emerge, and styles are mixed with wild abandon. The addition of a mansard roof, found often as a fifth floor, classifies these Italianates as Second Empire, named after the popularity of the mansard roof in the architecture of Napoleon II, in France.

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

The addition of carved ornamental patterns incised into the brownstone, alongside familiar Italianate motifs, shows the influence of the Neo-Grec style, itself a popular style here in Brooklyn. The Anglo Italianate has a short stoop and an English basement.

Because of their flat surfaces, Italianates and their cousins were easy prey for the modernizing of brownstones that took place in the 20th century. Cornices, window and door hoods, brackets, and even the graceful double doors have vanished on too many of our streets, leaving bare flat surfaces, improved by paint, stucco, brick and stone faces, and even vinyl siding.

In many of our historic districts as well as unprotected areas, it is not uncommon to see the ornate stoops removed for ground floor entrances, and the tall parlor floor windows bricked in to hold standard window sizes, or doorways filled in to accommodate cheap factory doors.

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

Fortunately, there are still surviving rows of intact Italianates in many neighborhoods, all of which remind us of why we love our brownstones. Long may they stand. Photo album on Flickr.

Charles Lockwood’s Bricks and Brownstone remains the bible for our brownstone heritage, and was the source of much of the historic and stylistic information. If you love this stuff, you must own this book.

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

Italianate Design in Brooklyn

Italianate Design in Brooklyn


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. Montrose, I love all your Walkabouts, and this post in particular! Lockwood is the bible on this subject. That said (please excuse the blatant plug here) my new book Restoring a House in the City has a section on brownstone. True brownstone was so porous and prone to water damage–one of the most fragile building materials ever employed in construction–that any original examples still hanging on are likely to be in very poor shape. In the 20th century, artisans from Europe brought Mediterranean stucco techniques to America, and adapted them for brownstone repair. Both original brownstone and the more durable stucco substitute that has for the most part replaced it is all hand-sculpted and hand-done. It’s not like chipping away at stone; both methods use a soft material that is sculpted and carved by hand into amazing flourishes like acanthus scrolls, leaves, and flowers. The Europeans trained subsequent generations of brownstone artisans, including the ones we see working out on our streets today. While not all brownstone repairers can do this kind of work, some modern brownstone craftsmen are incredible in what they can do. Without them, this would be a lost art. Meanwhile, Montrose, do you do actual walking tours? Love to join one.

  2. Interesting. In our 1890s frame house (which has bricks inside the walls and between the 2x4s) the brick party wall looks like it’s only one brick deep. I should look closer — maybe it’s two. In any case, it has gaping holes in it.

    The outside walls are thicker, but not by a lot.

  3. Minard, thank you for this complex and detailed answer. It is fascinating. I’d like to reply to you Friday or on the weekend, if you have time to check this thread again. Right now I just became tired (!) to explain why I asked. So thank you so much for your time and educated answer. (Actually don’t know if I can post on Friday, so more like the weekend.)

  4. sofar, your question is interesting and this is what I know:
    bricks were expensive and they were used sparingly. Most mid-century houses had bearing walls three bricks deep. But that would reduce to two above the second floor where the loads were not as great. When houses were built as a row, there was a further economy as one three-brick wall could support the floor beams of two adjacent houses. The trick was to stagger the beam pockets on each side of the wall. Still, on the upper floors, the wall was reduced to two bricks wythes. Fragile construction really. The sandstone veneer on the front facade was decoration -an important factor in the selling of real estate then as now. It is important to note that when these houses were built, labor was cheap but materials such as bricks and nails were expensive. Therefore the bearing walls were often underbuilt and the staircases under-nailed. However the hand carved volutes and acanthus-decorated consoles were plentiful.

  5. Thanks Montrose for this enlightenment. I will look at doors and adornments differently.

    As you wrote (above) of the 6-inches of Brownstone over brick, what do you know about the row houses that are just brick with no brownstone over the brick, such as those at Cobble Hill by the water? As in, are they just as durable without the further 6-inches of brownstone?

    And do you or someone here know exactly how thick is the brick between the row houses? I ask that for a particular reason that I would explain later. Thanks, Montrose.

    Thanks, too, Minard for your additional comments.

  6. “Calls Loudly for Adornment” sums it all up! Reminds me of Tom Wolfe’s description in “Bauhaus to Our House” of the ungrateful proletariat sprucing up their Modernist boxes with fripperies. Something in the human soul calls loudly for adornment, and that’s why we still love Victorian Brooklyn!

  7. Great post, MM. What I’ve loved seeing over the past decade or so is the large number of houses, certainly in Brooklyn Heights, Cobble Hill and Carroll Gardens, where owners are un-doing all of the 20th Century “modernization”. Stoops, cornices, window and door hoods, and entire facades are being completely restored, with all the detail. And I’ve also seen quite a few houses where the tall parlor floor windows and double doors are being restored to their original size – two houses being restored in this fashion right now on Amity and Pacific Streets in Cobble Hill.

  8. excellent writeup MM. I agree that “Bricks and Brownstones” is a terrific reference for anyone interested in the stylistic development of residential architecture in NYC.
    I would just add that the ornate quality of the Italianate style may have been a natural follow-up to the relative austerity of the Greek Revival style that was fading from fashion by 1845. New Yorkers of that period were prospering and I suppose they wanted to show off a little. This was never a puritanical city like Boston.