98-linden-street-012814

As market rents rise dramatically in North Brooklyn, landlords are destroying their own buildings to get rent-regulated tenants to move, according to stories in Gothamist and The New York Times today. Meanwhile, landlords are suing the new state agency designed to crack down on unscrupulous landlords who harass tenants or commit fraud to decontrol their buildings, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Gothamist details the story of Catalina Hidalgo, a tenant at 300 Nassau in Greenpoint who until recently was paying $754 a month in rent. After Hidalgo, an expediter and mother of two 18-month-old twins, reported the landlord for mishandling asbestos abatement during a gut renovation of the apartment below her, the supporting beam under her bathroom was removed. In December, the building’s boilers, water heater, and electrical systems were destroyed with an axe. The DOB issued a full vacate order for the six-unit building. One of the tenants is living in a homeless shelter; the others are staying with friends.

As it happens, the landlord, Joel Israel, is also the landlord of 98 Linden Street in Bushwick, profiled in the Times today. Brownstoner readers may be familiar with the story, which Brooklyn Bureau detailed last month. Under the guise of making repairs, the landlord ripped out floors, walls and plumbing in the kitchens and bathrooms of the two first floor apartments. Eight months later, the construction wreckage is still there and can be seen in a Times video.

Some new twists in the case: When the DOB fined the landlord for demo without a permit, the landlord successfully argued that the tenants had done it, despite a case against him for hundreds of violations by the Department of Housing and Preservation.

Gentrification has pushed so far out in Brooklyn that tenants are moving out of New York City altogether.

“The market for housing has expanded enough that there’s a demand for expensive apartments even that far out [in Brownsville and Canarsie],” Gothamist quoted Cypress Hills Development Corporation tenant organizer Dubois Thomas as saying. “I see it coming down Bushwick Avenue toward East New York — I literally see it. It’s kind of scary.”

Under Bloomberg, more than 60,000 rent regulated units were decontrolled, said the Times.

A tenant at 193 Bedford Avenue in north Williamsburg who works as a home attendant and street vendor was forced to move to Coney Island where she pays twice the rent when the city issued a vacate order because the building was in danger of “imminent collapse” because of the landlord’s “renovations,” according to Gothamist. The building has since been restored but the tenant cannot return to the building because her apartment has been rented to someone else for $3,000 a month.

Yesterday, landlords sued the state over the creation of a state agency, Tenant Protection Unit, designed to prevent exactly these sorts of abuses, claiming it is unfair to landlords.

De Blasio ran on a platform of ending these kinds of abuses and recently said he plans to strengthen tenant protection to prevent homelessness. He has also said he wants to increase development of new buildings and affordable units in them. Do you think these policies will work?

Gentrification Sparks Surge in Landlord Sabotage in North Brooklyn [Gothamist]
Tenants Living Amid Rubble in Rent-Regulated Apartment War [NY Times]
The Fight for 98 Linden [NY Times]
New York City Landlords Sue Over Tenant Protections [WSJ]
Photo by Nicholas Strini for PropertyShark

 


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. The city needs to get rid of any type of rent regulation and let the market find its real level. Might be more affordable in the long run. Artificially limiting supply (rent regulation) is the the fixable variable. Unscrupulous landlords and horrible tenants will always exist. As the owner of a non regulated building in Bed Stuy, where I also reside, I’m actually grateful for rent regulation – it keeps inventory low and my rental income high – thank you unintended consequence.

    • I see this argument a lot… Rent regulation keeps inventory low. Does anyone know the percentage of apts that are rent regulated compared to the total number of apts in NYC? Is it 10%, 5%. .0001%? Is this really a valid argument or just a talking point?

  2. The City needs to get their different agencies; DOB, ECB, HPD and the courts (L & T and ECB) or hearing agencies that police this mess to be able to log on to see each others files. Currently they cannot! One finger does not know what another digit even on the same hand is doing.
    On another point to show this does not just effect tenants.
    I know of a lady in Crown Heights: a 98 year old homeowner went into hospital, only to come home to find squatters in her house, the Police told her she needed to get an attorney. It was a “Civil Offence” they broke into her house. She called Con Ed & National Grid to turn the gas and electricity off, while her attorney tells her it will probably take six months to get the squatters out.
    The squatters call emergency services, they reconnect the gas and electricity pay the heat & hot water bill; billing the owner as emergency repairs! Make some other “improvements”… to two bathrooms and a kitchen as emergency repairs, billed to the owner. Meanwhile the Police serve the building with a neighborhood nuisance notice for drug dealing activity. And the DOB files a volition for illegally creating a residential unit in the basement…..
    If the City can make emergency repairs for squatters to a one family house, that should be an owner occupied house and bill the owner, why in heavens name can’t the City give these tenants a new kitchen and bathroom? And bill it to the Landlord?
    This is the kind of nonsense that gives all Landlords a bad name and distracts from the real issues that is wrong with Rent Stabilization.
    City agencies that are there to subsidize and help poor people, need to work with landlords, instead of treating them like they are the bad guys. Why should a landlord have to take a tenant to court, just to get social services to generate the checks on time, for example.
    And for the record, most landlords would rather not use attorneys to bring these “bookkeeping issue” cases to court, but all LLC’s Corps, Inc’s etc. have to be represented by an attorney.
    To get back to the story at hand, Landlords such as the noted, should not be allowed to own buildings, they are no different than the squatters dealing drugs from a house that they have no right to be in….they are criminals by any moral or ethical standard……but it seems not the criminal court system.

  3. Thank you. That was very helpful. With almost 50% of the available housing stock rent regulated I can understand the frustration, definitely seems like more than just a talking point. I appreciate that there needs to be a real discussion around this issue. Nothing, however, justifies a landlord purposefully endangering the lives of his tenants.

1 2