447skylight.jpg
As long as we’ve been in the neighborhood, the former Galilee Baptist Church at 447 Clinton Avenue has been a source of great fascination. Long-abandoned and rapidly deteriorating, the 1850-ish Italianate mansion (originally the David Burdette House) was calling out to be loved. In January 2005, the property, which goes all the way through the block and includes a carriage house (also in rough shape) on Waverly, was bought for $1,725,000 by a serial rehabber who’s lived in Brownstone Brooklyn for the better part of two decades. While continuing to market the property at a significantly higher price (even going in contract at one point), Clinton Rising LLC proceeded to plan a renovation and conversion. After ill-advisedly starting down the road with one architect whose name shall go unmentioned, the developer teamed up with Franke, Gottsegen, Cox Architects and started to make some unconventional choices. Rather than try to squeeze in as many two-bedroom condo units as possible, a plan evolved to create just four rental apartments in the 9,600-square-foot main building and two more out back by converting the existing carriage house and building a second one of similar size (which they already have LPC approval for). Last week we got to tag along with the developer, his architect Matthew Gottsegen and Carver Farrell who runs his own design-build firm called Living Space Design as they walked through the project. As you’ll see from the photos on the jump, there is some beautiful original detail left. The design calls for preserving as much as possible (including both the main and back staircases) and juxtaposing it with a clean, stripped-down modern aesthetic. From the drawings we saw and the raw material they have to work with, we’re optimistic about the outcome. Lots of photos (and a rendering) on the jump.
Serious Dumpster Action on Clinton Avenue [Brownstoner] GMAP
Wazzup With 447 Clinton Avenue? [Brownstoner]

447clintonschematic.jpg

447brick2.jpg

447brick.jpg

447entryhall.jpg

447arch.jpg

447basement.jpg

447hardware-v.jpg 447masardint-v.jpg

447mansardroofin.jpg

447rear2.jpg

447rear.jpg

447carriagerear.jpg


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. Oh, that explains it. I certainly don’t blame the bloke: if I had several million dollars lying around, I would have affairs of the heart with half of Clinton Hill, a decent part of Fort Greene, and a not-insignificant part of Bed-Stuy!

  2. Cool! At last, someone who is not trying to remove every inch of originality, and better yet, not going to tear the building down.

    Maybe their progress can be added to the reno blogs, even if only on a once a month basis. This is an interesting project, and the scale makes it very photographable.

    I always wondered what it looked like in there too.

  3. Our impression was that this project is more of an affair of the heart for the developer and he just doesn’t want to relinquish ownership of the property–that’s why he’s making it rental.

  4. I’m with lesterhead! I live right next door to this place, and I’ve been following the building’s progress (from my balcony – talk about a bird’s eye view!) with the greatest interest. Yay to you for getting inside!!!

    It warms my heart to know that the existing original details will be preserved – it’s such a beauty of a place, and it deserves the best – but I was surprised to read that the whole project will be rental-only. I would love to know how the developer crunched his numbers, and came up with the result that rentals, rather than two-bedroom condos, would turn the best profit, especially in a gem of a building like that. I think gwbrubaker is right – the price range of those rentals is going to have to be something else to justify such a decision.

  5. I have to agree with lesterhead on both accounts. I’ve been dying to see what is in there, and I fear that the price range of the rentals will be far and above my means. I live a block away and it’s a hard call, as this block has some positives as well as drawbacks.