What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. It’s not the Landlords that I’m sympathetic too…. it’s the Tax Payers paying to subsidize the RS/RC tenants.

    What’s curious would be if there were a Survey that could ask each tax payer with Market Rate apts if they don’t mind helping someone who has a relatively cheap RS/RC apt, say, $1k for a 2 bedroom in a decent area get zero rent increase.

    BUT, since DeBlasio got voted in, I’m assuming that the majority of NYC tax payers are really that Compassionate.

  2. No. Landlords didnt know it! As Deblasio said, the zero percent increase is “Historic”. Deblasio changed the rules suddenly. When people bought buildings they worked off the average increase permitted by the rent guidelines board the last few years. BAnks lent on those projections. Deblasio, not being a businessman doesnt comprehend the ramifications of changing the rules of the game midgame.
    So doesnt Putin…. or any communist for that matter.

  3. IronBall’s got a good point. Like some who complains about their Landlord inheriting their buildings rather than buying it and taking the risk, a RS/RC tenant is like winning the Lottery.

    The only problem is that while RS/RC tenants are like winning the lottery, those LLs who bought their properties are forced to hand over the lottery money.

  4. I’m not 100% sure what would be a better solution, but if all the apts were Market Rates and the City provided Vouchers to help those that need it as long as they prove they need it, it might be a better system than the one we have today which makes someone feel very entitled or trapped in their situation.

1 2