We toured one of the unfinished seven townhouses on Sackett Street yesterday, part of the 11 townhomes on Sackett and Union and the condo complex that comprise the Sackett Union development. Ken Horn, president of developer Alchemy Properties, said the Sackett Street townhouses would be finished by November 1, and the Union Street townhouses would be finished in the next year. The two-family home we saw at 298 Sackett is one of four townhouses still available. It had five bedrooms and 5.5 bathrooms spread across four stories plus a basement, totaling 4,240 square feet with an asking price of $3,680,000.

When we last toured the complex, the townhouse we saw was in a much rawer state. At 298 Sackett, there is a one-bedroom rental on the garden level. In the owner’s triplex, all the living is on the parlor (first) floor, including a small den at the front of the house, a powder room, and plenty of closets. The kitchen is open to the living room and there is no formal dining room. Bedrooms are on the second and third floors. Each townhouse has a roof deck and a backyard. The houses come with a parking space in the adjacent condo complex, and for $250 a year, townhouse residents can use the fitness center and children’s playroom in the condo building.

Click through the jump to see pictures of the interiors!

Below, the fronts of the under construction townhouses, with staircases leading down to the garden levels.

Garden-level apartment, below.

The first floor.

The second floor.

The master bedroom.

Below, the third floor.

View from the roof deck, below.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. The choice to build some of these as two families is strange as in doing so the main house is left with virtually in living space. I saw these and while there is a small study, the main living/dining area is tiny, even the staging shows it, the couches in the picture are small two seaters and the table is pushed against the wall. Why anyone would pay $3.65 million for a house with such a tiny living space and the aggregation of a tenant beyond me, this is not the price point where having a rental makes the ownership of the house more affordable. Strange decision by the developers