110 Court Street, 1

Brooklyn, one building at a time.

Name: “The Heights” Retail Complex
Address: 110 Court Street
Cross Streets: Schermerhorn and State Streets
Neighborhood: Brooklyn Heights
Year Built: 1999-2000
Architectural Style: Modernist, Brutalist???
Architect: Hardy Holzman Pfeiffer Associates (HHPA)
Other Work by Architect: Renovation/Restoration of BAM Majestic Theater, Brooklyn. Also restoration of Radio City Music Hall, New Victory and New Amsterdam Theaters, as re-do of Bryant Park, Manhattan. Also many other projects all over the world.
Landmarked: No

The story:
When I first moved to Brooklyn, in 1983, this block was a mess. Downtown Brooklyn was probably at its lowest point in history, and this block, which had small retail stores, a deli, pizza parlor, and a movie theater, was in varying stages of decay. The movie theater, which had opened as the Boro Hall Theater in 1924, was now the Cine-Art Theater, specializing in porn, with occasional live strip shows. It gave class to the whole neighborhood. NOT.

In 1989, even they gave up the ghost, and the theater doors were boarded up, leaving a dark, graffiti-engraved cave-like entrance where the homeless and other desperate people found shelter and a place to relieve themselves or shoot up. One by one the businesses closed, and so when Forest City Ratner bought up the whole block, everyone in the area was quite happy about it. Unfortunately, there was a lot of time between purchase and project, and this block was still dangerous and scary for many years. I remember the wind used to blow garbage and newspapers into the doorways, covering the homeless guy in the theater entryway, and at a time when not much of New York City was ever clean, this was always worse.

Forest City began tearing the old buildings down, and out of the rubble came this strange building. I don’t recall anyone every saying they liked it, and by the time it was finished, it was official – it was strange and quite unattractive. But it gave us a decent, safe and clean movie theater, a 12-plex, even, which downtown hadn’t had in fifty years, and it gave us Barnes & Noble Booksellers, with a Starbucks inside. Who’s going to complain about that? Well, of course, plenty of people. This is Brooklyn, after all.

Forest City Ratner and their architects, HHPA, said this about the building, which they had named “The Heights”: “Design of the new building responds to the assorted architectural influences of its surroundings, and with careful manipulation of massing and materials, minimizes its impact. A marquee at the southeast corner announces the cinemas’ entrance and through the use of glass corners, exposes activities within cinema lobbies. To express individual cinemas and enliven the windowless facades, HHPA developed a design that juxtaposes a broad spectrum of colors, patterns, and setbacks creating an overlap that variegates the tower’s dimensions and patterns.”

Today, thirteen years later, the building has sort of grown on us. It no longer shocks; its multicolored chevrons have mellowed with age, and we are more used to seeing tall but rather ungainly buildings rising on Brooklyn’s avenues. Barnes & Noble is full of children in strollers, nannies and parents, teenagers slouched in the aisles and adults at their computers at Starbucks. The movie theater shows the latest blockbusters, and the lines sometimes stretch back as far as Barnes & Noble’s doors. Whether you like the design or not, the building works as it was intended, anchoring the retail and fast food joints on this end of Court Street. Should we have expected more? GMAP

Scot Bintner for Property Shark, 2007. Theaters now belong to Regal Cinema.
Scott Bintner for PropertyShark, 2007. Theaters now belong to Regal Cinema.
1980s tax photo, Municipal Archives
1980s tax photo, Municipal Archives.
Close up of tile work on upper stories.
Close up of tile work on upper stories.

What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. I lived half a block from Court, between Schermerhorn and state and I remember the transition. I remember the whining about the “element” the movie theater would attract and to be honest, I was thrilled with the idea of a movie theater and a Barnes & Noble just up the street. I remember going to the Metropolitan all too well. especially the time we had to sit with our feet up on the seats next to us as the rats ran around on the floor. It was a distinctly NYC experience. when I moved to Schermerhorn it was a dicey area. The porn theater was still open and so was Pandora books. The produce place was not a Trader Joes and at night, it got pretty deserted. The apt. bldg at 96 Schermerhorn was still boarded up and had 24 hour guard dogs. I was held up at gun point once, almost mugged on Court twice and there was a sniper too. Trust me, I LOVE the Cineplex. It brought life back to that section of Court. Still an ugly building, but still a huge improvement.

  2. One of the oddest moments in recent architectural commentary came when this building was finished, and everyone was questioning that zig-zag tiled windowless box at the top. The papers quoted the lead architect complaining how hard it was to “make something this big look good” which only invited more press criticism. With other, more recent projects from the same developer for comparison, perhaps the best we can say about this building is “well, it could have been worse,” which now seems to pass for praise.

1 2 3