Editor’s note: An updated version of this post can be viewed here.

Brooklyn, one building at a time.

Name: Charles W. Betts House
Address: 97 MacDonough Street
Cross Streets: Tompkins and Throop Avenues
Neighborhood: Stuyvesant Heights
Year Built: 1861
Architectural Style: Italianate villa
Architect: Unknown
Landmarked: Yes, part of the Stuyvesant Heights HD (1971)

The story: This is the oldest remaining house in Bedford Stuyvesant, most definitely the oldest house in Stuyvesant Heights. It is fitting that it lies on the first block of the longest and most significant of Stuyvesant Heights’ streets, MacDonough Street, because it introduces a passer-by to a long and impressive history of fine building that continues down the length of the street. It’s the beginning of the timeline.

Significant, also, is who built it. Charles W. Betts was the Secretary of the Brooklyn Railroad Company, and he was a large landowner in the area, and one of its largest developers. A railroad man would know the importance of land and homes in an area that, even in the mid 1800’s, had good public roads, public transportations, and the nearby railroad line. He was sitting on gold. He had this spacious square Italianate villa built, a typical house for the suburban area that this part of Brooklyn was at the time. The house has a splendid octagonal cupola on top, a wide porch, and large windows. It also sits on a nice big plot of land.

Betts didn’t stay here all that long, moving on to bigger and better homes, and in 1865, he sold the house to Chancellor H. Brooks, a wholesale hops dealer. He was a business associate and friend of William Parker, who lived in the Second Empire masterpiece next door, at 87 MacDonough, who was also in the hops business. This would have been the perfect home for these merchants, as the breweries of Bushwick were only a short carriage ride away. In the late 1890’s, the home belonged to the popular minister, Dr. R.R. Meredith, whose church, the Tompkins Avenue Congregational Church, was less than half a block away, at the corner of Tompkins and MacDonough. He retired and sold the house in 1902.

As Stuyvesant Heights was developed with blocks of brownstones and other rowhouses, and later, apartment buildings, this property, as well as the estate next door, never succumbed to an owner’s desire to sell. The house has been much altered over the years, with a simulated stone face covering on the bottom floor, and aluminum siding on top, and metal porch overhangs, but most of the details are still there, including the porch columns, the gables and brackets, and the original doors and windows.

97 MacDonough Street has been in the hands of the same extended family for generations, and they have taken superb care of the house and the grounds. I’m told the inside is impeccable and retains much of its period detail. When I first moved to Bed Stuy in 1983, this house looked exactly the same as it does now. These two freestanding houses remain some of the most interesting and significant houses in the entire area. GMAP

Photo: New York Times
Photo: New York Times
Photo: 1980's tax photo, via Property Shark

What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. methistory very interesting.
    I guess that’s why you live in the Upper West Side, all that sunlight and shadow up there. I hear the census discovered several families south of 96th Street who earn less than $250,000 a year.

  2. methistory very interesting.
    I guess that’s why you live in the Upper West Side, all that sunlight and shadow up there. I hear the census discovered several families south of 96th Street who earn less than $250,000 a year.

    • I don’t live on the Upper West Side, although I work here, which doesn’t count for census/income figuring. You people from Brooklyn have no idea of the neighborhoods here – why don’t you become less provincial?

      Also all the homeless here earn less than $250,000.

  3. MM, the house with the bright yellow awnings is in OK condition. I can appreciate how much it must cost to maintain a house like that even in just passable condition.
    But the other one, the one with the incredible tower mansard, looked so bad to me the last time i walked by.

  4. Someone who knows and loves the owner should tell them that bright yellow awnings on a mustard yellow house is just gross. Sorry..
    Number 97 looks OK, getting by.
    But 87 looks like death warmed over. That house is in serious trouble. It needs repairs asap.