To Own or to Rent?

Over the weekend The New York Times profiled a series of co-op or condo owners who became renters either due to the market downturn, size requirements, or both. The article begins, for example, with a family of four that moves from an 850-square-foot Upper East Side two-bedroom, one-bathroom co-op to an Upper East Side rental—three bedrooms, three bathrooms, and 1,400 square feet for $5,200 per month. The praises sung for renterhood include: freedom from responsibility and anxiety, fewer financial requirements, more space, and sometimes more amenities. Some of those profiled in the article, however, miss ownership: the camaraderie in the building, the freedom to renovate and customize, the autonomy of ownership. Those profiled are primarily individuals, couples, or families who live in expensive Manhattan neighborhoods like the Upper East Side, the Upper West, or Greenwich Village—people who can afford rents of $5,000. It would be interesting to hear from readers with a wider range of incomes and locations. For example, has anyone out there had a similar experience in Brooklyn, where you have recently sold a house or apartment (either by choice or necessity) in order to become a renter?
Owners No More [NY Times]
Image by Mark Ovaska
May 21, 2012 | 02:16 PM